Who Owns the Intellectual Property to UFC’s Octagon?

OctagonJake Rossen of ESPN.com has written an interesting article on the origins of the octagonal fighting ring used by the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) since its inception.  Greg Patschull, a martial artist who built an octagonal ring for an event prior to UFC’s development of the Octagon, claims that he owns the intellectual property associated with the Octagon.

If true, does Patschull have any legal recourse?  Not according to Connecticut’s own Richard Twilley, an intellectual property attorney at McCormick, Paulding & Huber LLP in Hartford.

Rossen writes:

…according to Connecticut-based patent attorney Richard Twilley, Patschull’s window of opportunity has closed. He had only one year to file for a patent after he unveiled the cage in Irvine.

“If you use something in public for more than a year, or if something is more than a year old and you don’t file patent protection for it, it’s gone,” Twilley said. “And that doesn’t even broach the subject of the statute of limitations. Depending on the state, he should’ve sued by ’96 or ’99. If his focus is on the eight-sided shape of the ring, that ship has sailed.”

[Semaphore Entertainment Group], meanwhile, received a trademark in September 1997 for an “octagon-shaped fighting surface,” a protection that [UFC] inherited. “They filed for trademark incontestability as well,” added Twilley, which he said insulates against virtually all challenges against ownership of the mark.

“If they ever went to a lawsuit and it was this guy versus UFC, I would take my mortgage and I would bet on the UFC,” Twilley said. “I can’t come up with a single legal theory in which he’d have even a puncher’s chance of prevailing.”

Excellent work, Rich.  To read Rossen’s article in its entirety, click here.

Comments

  1. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but
    I find this topic to be really something that I think I would never understand.
    It seems too complicated and extremely broad for me.
    I am looking forward for your next post, I’ll
    try to get the hang of it!

  2. So…would it be right to assume that you can not use the octagon shape, with any item or for any reason?

  3. Pax Humana says:

    I would actually not only dismiss the claim that Dana White had over the Octagon, but I would also sue anyone that made a similar claim, as 1. numerous cities worldwide utilize octagons as a part of street signs, most notably, as red and white versions of them being used in stop signs, in some places, blue and white octagons being used as slow signs, and that they also appear as parts of “Stop Ahead” signs (and good luck suing numerous cities, states, provinces, nations, and the like for those signs), 2. octagons being used as part of mathematical figures since antiquity, 3. octagons also being utilized in art since antiquity, 4. octagons being used in architecture since antiquity, and 5. that octagons are also naturally occurring in prism form in certain geological forms, and, if he argued otherwise, I would imprison him for his farce of a copyright claim.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: