Friday Night Rights: Arrest of Middletown Coaches Evokes Lessons of Stinson Case

July 13, 2010

Last week, two Middletown (Conn.) assistant football coaches were arrested on misdemeanor charges of second-degree reckless endangerment after allegedly withholding water from players during a strength and conditioning workout.  One of the players allegedly collapsed during the workout, which was held in 93 degree temperatures.  On that day that the National Weather Service placed sections of the state under a high-heat advisory.  Conflicting accounts of the story followed, including that of the school, which claims that the players each had their own water bottle and that the player in question did not collapse, but merely felt queasy and light-headed. 

The facts of this case are unclear and the school appears satisfied that the coaches acted appropriately.  Nevertheless, it serves as a timely reminder of the liability that coaches, athletic directors and schools face with respect to the safety of their student athletes. 

Last fall, Connecticut Sports Law discussed the tragic case of Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Jason David Stinson,  the first reported criminal case brought against a coach in connection with a player’s on-field death.  The coach was ultimately acquitted.  However, the well-publicized case was bound to trigger changes in high school athletics.  

With two-a-days fast approaching, properly dealing with hydration and the heat is of the utmost importance. Coaches, Athletic Directors and School Districts should evaluate their programs to ensure that the lessons from the Stinson case have been heeded.  Here are some of the changes that Connecticut Sports Law discussed:

1.  Legislative and Administrative Changes

The Stinson case gives cause for state legislatures, school boards and interest groups to examine their policies and procedures in an attempt to provide a safer environment for student-athletes.  New laws and rules will surely result.  In fact, the Commonwealth of Kentucky passed a law aimed at protecting players before the Stinson case was even tried.  Coaches in the Commonwealth now must take a 4-hour online course that covers topics from temperature-related illnesses to head, neck and facial injuries. 

The National Athletic Trainers’ Association recommended more stringent heat-related guidelines at the high school level.  Among the recommendations were eliminating two-a-day practices during the first week of August drills and giving players more time to recuperate.

2.  Contractual Changes

Although the Stinson case was prosecuted in criminal court (a civil claim has also been filed), civil claims are much more common at the high school level.  Coaches, more cognizant of the liability they face, will want to ensure that their employers will  provide indemnification in the event of a lawsuit.  Of course, employers are highly unlikely to indemnify coaches for claims that allege beyond mere negligence and rise to the level of recklessness.

Schools, on the other hand, may require that coaches complete first-aid training as a prerequisite to employment.  In addition, schools may require that a coach’s practice plans be approved by an athletic director or physician.  Although such measures may appear to be over the top, schools and towns recognize that they are likely to be included in any lawsuit against a coach in the event of a player injury or death.  Including such requirements into coaching contracts not only encourages compliance, but demonstrates that the school has made an attempt to protect its student-athletes by implementing a specific policy.  The existence of such a policy may help protect a school if litigation arises.

3.  Coaching Changes

The culture of coaching is bound to change.  The tough, old-school methods of toughening a team up – especially in football- are likely to become relics of the past.  Two-a-days, if they are even allowed to continue, will be carefully monitored.  Coaches will have to consider the heat, whether players are properly hydrated, and whether any players have complained of not feeling well, before ordering wind sprints.  Another issue, which was demonstrated by the New York Little League case discussed by Rick Reilly, concerns the teaching elements of coaching.  Coaches will not only have to teach players how to tackle, but how to avoid dangerous supplements and recognize signs of heat-related problems in teammates and themselves.  Documentation of the lessons taught may be equally important.  Smart coaches will keep practice logs detailing the nature of drills, time of practice, performance of players and any complaints of student-athletes.


Friday Night Rights: School Waivers May Not Be Enforceable

June 14, 2010

Legal Issues in High School Athletics has featured my recent article concerning a lawsuit arising from the injury of an East Lyme (Conn.) high school track athlete in its May-June 2010 issue.  The article fits in nicely with my blog series “Friday Night Rights”, which covers the legal and business issues that arise in high school sports. 

Connecticut Court Finds Waiver Unenforceable in Negligence Claim Against High School Arising from Track Practice Injury

During the winter, the scene is the same at high schools across New England.  The  basketball teams occupy the gymnasium from the moment the final bell rings.  Hockey teams schedule ice time at local arenas for practice and games.  With meets held at local colleges with large indoor facilities, the track team often has no official practice area.  As a matter of necessity, track coaches and athletes must be creative in finding practice space.  If I recall correctly from my days at Natick High School (Mass.), it was not unusual to see sprinters and hurdlers practicing their craft in the school hallways.

 In 2007, East Lyme High School (Conn.) had a similar practice.  Sprinters would practice in a straight hallway.  During one drill, sprinters would race in pairs for approximately 100 yards.  They had allegedly been coached to finish with their heads down and extended, to provide the best opportunity for victory.  Following the sprint, the momentum of the athletes would carry them into a concrete wall, which the athletes would use to brace themselves and stop.  Unfortunately, during one of these drills an East Lyme sprinter was unable to stop.  Nicholas Furlani’s feet became tangled with another sprinter’s feet at the finish line, causing him to crash head-first into the concrete wall and suffer injury.  Mr. Furlani subsequently brought a lawsuit, Furlani v. Town of East Lyme, Docket Number CV08-5005850-S, against town and school officials in East Lyme.

 The defendants moved for summary judgment, in part arguing that the plaintiff, through his parents, had released the defendants by signing a waiver.  The relevant language in the purported waiver stated as follows:

 I will not hold the East Lyme Public Schools or the East Lyme Board of Education or its employees responsible for any injury sustained while engaging in any practice or game or while traveling to or from practices or contests.

 The Court (Parker, J.T.R.), in Furlani v. Town of East Lyme, 2010 WL 744995 (Conn. Super. Jan. 22, 2010), found that the waiver did not in fact release the defendants from their alleged negligence.  First, the Court found that the release was not sufficiently specific.  Citing the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in Hyson v. White Mountain Resorts of Connecticut, 265 Conn. 636 (2003), the Court noted that the release did not unequivocally state that claims predicated on the releasee’s negligence were being released.  Second, the Court drew parallels to the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decisions in prior cases, which held that exculpatory agreements in connection with recreational activities were void against public policy.

In fact, the Connecticut Supreme Court has consistently held that there is an important public policy in promoting participation in recreational and athletic activities, which “constitute an important and healthy part of everyday life.”  Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp., 276 Conn. 314 (2005).  In so holding, the Court has voided exculpatory agreements in connection with snow tubing, horseback riding and health clubs.  See Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.; Reardon v. Windswept Farm, LLC; and Schneeloch v. Glastonbury Fitness & Wellness, Inc., 2009 WL 416645 (Conn. Super. Feb. 2, 2009).

 The Court in Furlani recognized the distinction between exculpatory agreements in the private context of recreational facilities, such as ski resorts, equestrian centers and health clubs, and high school athletics.  Nevertheless, the Court saw no reason to deviate from its policy of voiding agreements that attempt to disclaim negligence in the context of recreational activity. 

 Considering the Connecticut Supreme Court’s stated public policy of promoting recreational activities, one could argue that those policy concerns are amplified when dealing with high school athletics.  The participants are often minors, and the relationship between coach and high school student athlete involves far different dynamics than the relationship between ski resort owner and participant, or health club owner and member.  High school student-athletes rely far more heavily on coaches for guidance and instruction.  Accordingly, it would appear that Connecticut courts would be unwilling to enforce any agreement disclaiming a school or coach’s negligence in connection with a student’s participation in high school athletics. 

 Legal Issues in High School Athletics is a bimonthly newsletter that features detailed case summaries, articles and news briefs that are relevant to high school athletics.  The newsletter is edited by veteran sports law journalist Holt Hackney of Hackney Publications.   Daniel B. Fitzgerald, publisher of the blog Connecticut Sports Law and attorney with Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, and Robert J. Romano, founder of the Romano Sports Agency, serve as contributing editors.  For subscription information, click here.


Friday Night Rights: Greenwich Soccer Injury Suit

February 19, 2010

Thanks to Jason Wolf’s Sports Agent & Sports Lawyer blog , I came across a sports litigation issue right in our backyard.  Greenwich parents Mark and Roseanne Sanford brought suit against the Town of Greenwich in 2005, after their son was injured while playing soccer at Central Middle School.  The son was injured after stepping in an alleged hidden pothole on the field, causing serious ankle and leg injuries.  The lawsuit, filed in Stamford Superior Court, has been scheduled for trial in February 2011.

Essentially, this is a typical personal injury matter.  However, it is possible that the plaintiffs may attempt to use the sports angle to increase the value of the case.  According to the Connecticut Post, the plaintiffs have voiced concerns that their son may be unable to compete at the collegiate level due to his injuries.

A claim that the plaintiffs son has lost an opportunity to compete at the collegiate level involves significant legal hurdles. Certainly their plaintiffs can demonstrate the out-of-pocket medical expenses.  But establishing liability and damages should the son be unable to play in college could prove difficult for the following reasons:

  1. The plaintiffs would be required to prove that their son’s injury, and not a lack of skill or desire, was the direct cause of his inability to play collegiate soccer;
  2. The plaintiffs may need expert witness testimony to establish that their son, but for the injury, possessed the requisite skills to play at the collegiate level; and
  3. The plaintiffs would be required to prove damages to a reasonable degree of certainty.  Unless their son was destined for a professional career, quantifying the monetary value of his loss might be difficult.

Although this case appears to be a typical personal injury matter, the sports element certainly may alter both the value of the claim and the burden of proof.


CT Sports Law’s Top 10 Story Lines of 2009: Part I

December 29, 2009

With 2009 coming to a close, I have compiled a list of the top story lines and accompanying blog posts from the past year.  Part I will list story lines 6 through 10; Part II will be posted tomorrow and will include 2 through 5; and the top story line will be posted on New Year’s Eve.  Thank you for your readership, comments, questions and support this year.  I look forward to another year covering the intersection of sports and the law.

6.  Legal issues in high school athletics.  From defamation suits against parents, to criminal actions against coaches, to national letters of intent, to selling advertising rights, the legal and business aspects of sports permeated high school athletics in 2009.

Is the National Letter of Intent Legally Enforceable?

National Signing Day: Beware of the National Letter of Intent

Corporate Advertising in High School Athletics

Title IX Applies to High School Athletics

Connecticut Coach Awarded $88k in Libel Lawsuit Against Parent

Advertising and Title IX in High School Athletics

Recruiting and Specialization in High School Athletics

Interview with Mary Anne Bojko

Part II of Mary Anne Bojko Interview

Trial of Coach in Player’s Death May Change High School Athletics

7.  Quinnipiac eliminates volleyball team and is hit with a Title IX lawsuit.

Quinnipiac Faces Title IX Lawsuit Over Elimination of Women’s Volleyball

Title IX Lawsuit Brings More Unwanted Attention for Quinnipiac

Quinnipiac Volleyball Players Testify in Title IX Lawsuit

Expert Analysis of Quinnipiac’s Compliance With Title IX

Quinnipiac Volleyball Team Reinstated After Injunction

8.  Phoenix Coyotes file for bankruptcy; NHL attempts to keep team in desert.  CT Sports Law contributing editor Dan Canavan provided the most comprehensive legal analysis of the Coyotes bankruptcy of anyone on the internet and did so with an eye towards Connecticut and the former Hartford Whalers.

Phoenix Coyotes Seek Bankruptcy Protection, Sale: Winners & Losers

Will The Attempted Relocation of The Phoenix Coyotes Help Bring The Whalers Back to Hartford?

Dan Canavan Interviewed on CBC Radio Regarding Phoenix Coyotes Sale

Part I: Bankruptcy Court Yet to Rule on Phoenix Coyotes Case

Part II: Bankruptcy Court Yet to Rule on Phoenix Coyotes Case

NHL Wins the Battle in the Desert, But Will it Win the War?

Phoenix Coyotes Auction to Favor Local Bidders

As Phoenix Coyotes Saga Continues, Hartford is Silent

Dan Canavan Interviewed on Phoenix Coyotes Bankruptcy

NHL Declares Victory Over Balsillie in Bankruptcy Case

NHL Finally Takes Ownership of Phoenix Coyotes

9.  UConn football makes presence known in NFL Draft; agents flock to Connecticut.

UConn’s Donald Brown Reverses Field, Headed to NFL

UConn Football Plays Major Role in NFL Draft

UConn Football’s Success Brings More Agents to Connecticut

10.  Colleges and Universities flex muscles asserting trademark rights in school colors.

Can Universities Trademark Their Colors?


Talk to My Lawyer: 3 Situations Requiring Counsel in Collegiate Athletics

November 4, 2009

RefCrop1.  National Letter of Intent (NLI): Despite the fact that the NLI is optional and heavily favors colleges and universities, student-athletes continue to sign on the dotted line.  It’s basically a take it or leave it proposition, and few players are willing to risk leaving a scholarship offer on the table.  Some coaches, like Kentucky’s John Calipari, have negotiated escape clauses into the NLI, allowing a player to be released from a school should his coach leave for another job.  Only the top-tier players have the leverage to negotiate terms, such as an escape clause.  Nevertheless, any high-school student-athlete should consult with an attorney to fully understand the terms of the NLI.

2.  NCAA Investigations: As the Dez Bryant situation has taught us, lying to NCAA investigators, even without an actual rule violation, can lead to a suspension.  A student-athlete would reasonably expect that his or her school’s compliance officer would provide counsel should NCAA investigators seek an interview.  But remember, the compliance officer’s allegiance is ultimately to the university.  A player should be provided the opportunity to seek counsel if faced with an investigation that could lead to a suspension.

UPDATE:  The NCAA has disclosed that Dez Bryant had counsel for present for all three of his meetings with NCAA investigators.

chalkboardcropped1.jpg3.  Coaching Contracts: Inequities in contractual negotiations should always be avoided.  Yet the lack of counsel in contract negotiations often create problems for coaches and universities alike.  At smaller Division I schools, a negotiation might take place between an athletic director and the agent for a coaching candidate.  The agent and coach are at a significant advantage if the athletic director does not use an attorney to negotiate the terms of the contract.  There’s simply no one to play bad cop to the athletic director’s good cop.  On the other hand, smaller Division II and III schools may essentially force form contracts upon coaching candidates.  In this situation, the compensation may be considered too small for either side to retain an attorney.  But form contracts do nothing to enhance the goals of either party - a key objective in any contract – regardless of how small the monetary value of the contract.


Friday Night Rights: Kentucky v. Stinson to Trigger Changes in High School Athletics

September 23, 2009

FridayA number of commentators have noted that the case of Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Jason David Stinson could have profound effects on high school athletics.  After all, this was the first criminal prosecution of a coach involving an on-field death.  Now that Stinson has been acquitted on all charges related to the death of Max Gilpin, what effect will this case have on high school athletics?

1.  Legislative and Administrative Changes

The Stinson case gives cause for state legislatures, school boards and interest groups to examine their policies and procedures in an attempt to provide a safer environment for student-athletes.  New laws and rules will surely result.  In fact, the Commonwealth of Kentucky passed a law aimed at protecting players before the Stinson case was even tried.  Coaches in the Commonwealth now must take a 4-hour online course that covers topics from temperature-related illnesses to head, neck and facial injuries. 

The National Athletic Trainers’ Association recommended more stringent heat-related guidelines at the high school level.  Among the recommendations were eliminating two-a-day practices during the first week of August drills and giving players more time to recuperate.

2.  Contractual Changes

Although the Stinson case was prosecuted in criminal court (a civil claim has also been filed), civil claims are much more common at the high school level.  Coaches, more cognizant of the liability they face, will want to ensure that their employers will  provide indemnification in the event of a lawsuit.  Of course, employers are highly unlikely to indemnify coaches for claims that allege beyond mere negligence and rise to the level of recklessness.

Schools, on the other hand, may require that coaches complete first-aid training as a prerequisite to employment.  In addition, schools may require that a coach’s practice plans be approved by an athletic director or physician.  Although such measures may appear to be over the top, schools and towns recognize that they are likely to be included in any lawsuit against a coach in the event of a player injury or death.  Including such requirements into coaching contracts not only encourages compliance, but demonstrates that the school has made an attempt to protect its student-athletes by implementing a specific policy.  The existence of such a policy may help protect a school if litigation arises.

3.  Coaching Changes

The culture of coaching is bound to change.  The tough, old-school methods of toughening a team up – especially in football- are likely to become relics of the past.  Two-a-days, if they are even allowed to continue, will be carefully monitored.  Coaches will have to consider the heat, whether players are properly hydrated, and whether any players have complained of not feeling well, before ordering wind sprints.  Another issue, which was demonstrated by the New York Little League case discussed by Rick Reilly, concerns the teaching elements of coaching.  Coaches will not only have to teach players how to tackle, but how to avoid dangerous supplements and recognize signs of heat-related problems in teammates and themselves.  Documentation of the lessons taught may be equally important.  Smart coaches will keep practice logs detailing the nature of drills, time of practice, performance of players and any complaints of student-athletes.


Hartford Courant on Bojko v. Lima

September 21, 2009

The Hartford Courant’s Lori Riley writes about former East Hartford High School swimming coach Mary Anne Bojko, and her lawsuit against a parent who defamed her:

“People have been so good to me, my friends, my family, colleagues, bosses,” she said. “The bottom line is, I’m livid this happened to me. My father [Thomas] was my coach. I swam at East Hartford. You walk in the pool lobby and there’s pictures and stuff from years and years ago. My father’s picture is there. And she goes and does this to my family. My name.

“I didn’t want to go to another school system. I grew up there. This is my town.”

Click here to read the article in its entirety.  To see Connecticut Sports Law’s coverage of this case, click here.


Friday Night Rights: Kentucky High School Coach Acquitted

September 18, 2009

In the first reported criminal case brought against a coach in connection with a player’s on-field death, high school football coach Jason Stinson was found not guilty of reckless homicide and wanton endangerment in connection with the death of  Max Gilpin.  The jury needed 90 minutes to reach its verdict.

Despite the testimony of several experts that Gilpin sufferred exertional heat stroke, and that of UConn professor Douglas Casa, who testified that Gilpin could have been saved if treated immediately after his collapse, the jury sided with Stinson.  Stinson’s defense included experts who testified that a combination of heat, the use of the dietary supplement creatine and attention deficit disorder drug Adderall, and being ill were the main factors that contributed to Gilpin’s death. (See full AP report).

While Stinson is reportedly cleared to return to teaching and apply for coaching positions, he still may be liable for Gilpin’s death in a civil lawsuit.

See ABC News’  Charles Gibson on the Stinson case:


Kentucky High School Football Coach Found Not Guilty in Death of Player

September 17, 2009

Referee-type-whistle-CS19CNN reports that Kentucky High School Football Coach Jason Stinson was found not guilty by a jury on charges arising from the death of one of his players, Max Gilpin.

More analysis to follow.

For more on this case, see the following Connecticut Sports Law posts:

Friday Night Rights: Trial of Coach in Player’s Death May Change High School Athletics

CTSportsLaw Readers on Stinson Case, Coaches Liability


Bojko v. Lima Article Published in Legal Issues in High School Athletics

September 16, 2009

istock_000003705748small15Legal Issues in High School Athletics has featured my article on the case of Bojko v. Lima, in its September-October 2009 issue.  The article provides a more in-depth look at the case and incorporates parts of my interview with Mary Anne Bojko.  Thanks to Mary Anne Bojko for her taking the time to speak with me and for sharing her story with Connecticut Sports Law readers. 

Connecticut High School Coach Awarded $88k in Libel Suit Against Parent

After 9 years as the girls’ swim coach at East Hartford (Conn.) High School, and six years teaching and coaching middle-school sports in Windsor (Conn.), Mary Anne Bojko was excited to return to East Hartford High in the fall of 2006 to coach the swim team.  For Bojko, it was truly a homecoming. She had attended East Hartford High (while it was called Penney High) and was a member of the swim team, coached by her father. But unfortunately, Bojko’s good fortune was short-lived.

Laurie Lima, mother of the team’s captain, Hope Lima, became involved in a disagreement with Bojko over a team banquet. Lima subsequently engaged in an email and internet campaign directed to various state and local officials, accusing Bojko of being a pedophile. Lima also demanded that Bojko be fired from her coaching position, alleged that she was “dangerous” to children, and demanded investigations by the State Board of Education and the Department of Children and Families.

Bojko was forced to take legal action, and filed suit against Lima in Connecticut Superior Court. “I had to sue,” said Bojko. “I filed suit to put an end to the untrue comments that were being made about me…I was dealing with this on a daily basis.”

The matter of Bojko v. Lima was tried before the Honorable Judge Julia L. Aurigemma, who described Lima’s email campaign as “absolutely unbelievable.” Lima, who represented herself, admitted that she had no evidence that Bojko was a pedophile.  Judge Aurigemma even cited evidence that Lima’s daughter didn’t support her mother’s allegations.  In an email to the school’s principal, Hope Lima wrote “I told my mom that she may have misunderstood me (or else she just likes to lie for the hell of it).”

sealJudge Aurigemma deemed Lima’s attacks as “malicious, outrageous and evil.”  With a complete lack of evidence supporting Lima’s claims, Judge Aurigemma ruled in favor of Bojko, on all of her claims: libel, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with business expectancy, false light invasion of privacy, and vexatious litigation (on account of Lima’s admittedly baseless counterclaim).

Bojko, who was represented by Christopher Stone of Chadwick & Stone, was awarded damages totaling $88,364. Even if Bojko is able to collect the judgment, she has not been made whole. She resigned from her coaching post and spent countless hours dealing with this matter. “I was completely consumed by it for two years,” said Bojko. “Every day I would turn on the computer and find more false statements had been published and would have to save the information for evidence.” Bojko also added that the case was very difficult on her parents, who testified on her behalf.

Bojko v. Lima is sure to become a discussion point concerning coach-parent relations, and Bojko has noted changes in the dynamics of coaching over her career. “Today’s coaches are dealing with so many outside distractions. Coaches are even changing game plans because of parents.  Undoubtedly some are deciding that it’s not worth it.” However, Bojko is quick to point out that most parents, as well as East Hartford school officials, supported her. “A number of parents were willing to testify on my behalf.  I had many, many great parents and student-athletes.  I needed them, and they were there for me.”

Although coaches are facing lawsuits and criticism from parents with increased frequency, the facts of this case are extreme. Lima’s actions were so extreme that drawing lessons from this case is difficult, if not impossible. However, Bojko v. Lima is an important case in coach-parent relations, and certainly demonstrates that coaches do have some recourse when parents cross the line from criticism to defamation.

Legal Issues in High School Athletics is a bimonthly newsletter that features detailed case summaries, articles and news briefs that are relevant to high school athletics.  The newsletter is edited by veteran sports law journalist Holt Hackney of Hackney Publications.   Daniel B. Fitzgerald, publisher of the blog Connecticut Sports Law and attorney with Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, and Robert J. Romano, founder of the Romano Sports Agency, serve as contributing editors.  For subscription information, click here.