<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competitive Cheering a Varsity Sport? Quinnipiac Title IX Case May Provide Answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ctsportslaw.com/2010/07/21/competitive-cheering-a-varsity-sport-quinnipiac-title-ix-case-may-provide-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ctsportslaw.com/2010/07/21/competitive-cheering-a-varsity-sport-quinnipiac-title-ix-case-may-provide-answers/</link>
	<description>Covering the Intersection of Sports and the Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 13:03:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Competitive Cheerleading is Not a Title IX Eligible Sport - Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s Sport News</title>
		<link>http://ctsportslaw.com/2010/07/21/competitive-cheering-a-varsity-sport-quinnipiac-title-ix-case-may-provide-answers/#comment-9353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Competitive Cheerleading is Not a Title IX Eligible Sport - Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s Sport News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctsportslaw.com/?p=3657#comment-9353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Judge Underhill&#8217;s decision is important because it offers a first-impression opinion by a federal judge that cheerleading is not a sport. It means that schools using cheerleading for purposes of Title IX should reconsider their policies or, if in Connecticut, change them. Keep in mind, though, other judges in other jurisdictions could reach different determinations, and given the lack of other precedent on this issue and given that cheerleading could become more formalized in the years ahead, it is certainly possibly that other judges, if faced with the same question, will conclude that competitive cheer is a Title IX eligible sport.  Update: For an excellent analysis of this decision, see Professor Erin Buzuvis&#8217;s piece on Title IX Blog. See also Dan Fitzgerald&#8217;s extensive and insightful commentary of the case on Connecticut Sports Law. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Judge Underhill&#8217;s decision is important because it offers a first-impression opinion by a federal judge that cheerleading is not a sport. It means that schools using cheerleading for purposes of Title IX should reconsider their policies or, if in Connecticut, change them. Keep in mind, though, other judges in other jurisdictions could reach different determinations, and given the lack of other precedent on this issue and given that cheerleading could become more formalized in the years ahead, it is certainly possibly that other judges, if faced with the same question, will conclude that competitive cheer is a Title IX eligible sport.  Update: For an excellent analysis of this decision, see Professor Erin Buzuvis&#8217;s piece on Title IX Blog. See also Dan Fitzgerald&#8217;s extensive and insightful commentary of the case on Connecticut Sports Law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT Sports Law&#8217;s Top Story Lines of 2010 &#8211; Part II &#171; CONNECTICUT SPORTS LAW</title>
		<link>http://ctsportslaw.com/2010/07/21/competitive-cheering-a-varsity-sport-quinnipiac-title-ix-case-may-provide-answers/#comment-7339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CT Sports Law&#8217;s Top Story Lines of 2010 &#8211; Part II &#171; CONNECTICUT SPORTS LAW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctsportslaw.com/?p=3657#comment-7339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Competitive Cheering a Varsity Sport? Quinnipiac Title IX Case May Provide Answers [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Competitive Cheering a Varsity Sport? Quinnipiac Title IX Case May Provide Answers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Competitive Cheerleading is Not a Title IX Eligible Sport &#124; news</title>
		<link>http://ctsportslaw.com/2010/07/21/competitive-cheering-a-varsity-sport-quinnipiac-title-ix-case-may-provide-answers/#comment-4252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Competitive Cheerleading is Not a Title IX Eligible Sport &#124; news]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctsportslaw.com/?p=3657#comment-4252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Judge Underhill&#8217;s decision is important because it offers a first-impression opinion by a federal judge that cheerleading is not a sport. It means that schools using cheerleading for purposes of Title IX should reconsider their policies or, if in Connecticut, change them. Keep in mind, though, other judges in other jurisdictions could reach different determinations, and given the lack of other precedent on this issue and given that cheerleading could become more formalized in the years ahead, it is certainly possibly that other judges, if faced with the same question, will conclude that competitive cheer is a Title IX eligible sport.Update: For an excellent analysis of this decision, see Professor Erin Buzuvis&#8217;s piece on Title IX Blog. See also Dan Fitzgerald&#8217;s extensive and insightful commentary of the case on Connecticut Sports Law. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Judge Underhill&#8217;s decision is important because it offers a first-impression opinion by a federal judge that cheerleading is not a sport. It means that schools using cheerleading for purposes of Title IX should reconsider their policies or, if in Connecticut, change them. Keep in mind, though, other judges in other jurisdictions could reach different determinations, and given the lack of other precedent on this issue and given that cheerleading could become more formalized in the years ahead, it is certainly possibly that other judges, if faced with the same question, will conclude that competitive cheer is a Title IX eligible sport.Update: For an excellent analysis of this decision, see Professor Erin Buzuvis&#8217;s piece on Title IX Blog. See also Dan Fitzgerald&#8217;s extensive and insightful commentary of the case on Connecticut Sports Law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: news &#187; Competitive Cheerleading is Not a Title IX Eligible Sport</title>
		<link>http://ctsportslaw.com/2010/07/21/competitive-cheering-a-varsity-sport-quinnipiac-title-ix-case-may-provide-answers/#comment-4155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[news &#187; Competitive Cheerleading is Not a Title IX Eligible Sport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ctsportslaw.com/?p=3657#comment-4155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Judge Underhill&#8217;s decision is important because it offers a first-impression opinion by a federal judge that cheerleading is not a sport. It means that schools using cheerleading for purposes of Title IX should reconsider their policies or, if in Connecticut, change them. Keep in mind, though, other judges in other jurisdictions could reach different determinations, and given the lack of other precedent on this issue and given that cheerleading could become more formalized in the years ahead, it is certainly possibly that other judges, if faced with the same question, will conclude that competitive cheer is a Title IX eligible sport.Update: For an excellent analysis of this decision, see Professor Erin Buzuvis&#8217;s piece on Title IX Blog. See also Dan Fitzgerald&#8217;s extensive and insightful commentary of the case on Connecticut Sports Law. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Judge Underhill&#8217;s decision is important because it offers a first-impression opinion by a federal judge that cheerleading is not a sport. It means that schools using cheerleading for purposes of Title IX should reconsider their policies or, if in Connecticut, change them. Keep in mind, though, other judges in other jurisdictions could reach different determinations, and given the lack of other precedent on this issue and given that cheerleading could become more formalized in the years ahead, it is certainly possibly that other judges, if faced with the same question, will conclude that competitive cheer is a Title IX eligible sport.Update: For an excellent analysis of this decision, see Professor Erin Buzuvis&#8217;s piece on Title IX Blog. See also Dan Fitzgerald&#8217;s extensive and insightful commentary of the case on Connecticut Sports Law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

